For written verification received by the organization, which accreditation uses the date on the letter or report, not the receipt date?

For written verification received by the organization, which accreditation uses the date on the letter or report, not the receipt date?

• A. Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP)
• B. Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC)
• C. Det Norske Veritas (DNV)
• D. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)

Answer: (D)

When evaluating written verification, the date that matters is the date shown on the document from the issuer. NCQA requires you to treat the verification as received on that issue date, not the date the organization actually received it. This matters because credentialing timelines and renewal windows depend on the issuer’s date, not processing delays. Using the letter’s date keeps the verification currency clear and standardized across files, avoiding distortions that could happen if you relied on when the document arrived. Some other accrediting bodies may handle receipt dates differently, but NCQA’s standard keeps the verification’s validity anchored to the issuer’s date, which is why this is the best choice.

When evaluating written verification, the date that matters is the date shown on the document from the issuer. NCQA requires you to treat the verification as received on that issue date, not the date the organization actually received it. This matters because credentialing timelines and renewal windows depend on the issuer’s date, not processing delays. Using the letter’s date keeps the verification currency clear and standardized across files, avoiding distortions that could happen if you relied on when the document arrived. Some other accrediting bodies may handle receipt dates differently, but NCQA’s standard keeps the verification’s validity anchored to the issuer’s date, which is why this is the best choice.