For written verification received by the organization, which accreditation uses the date on the letter or report, not the receipt date?

For written verification received by the organization, which accreditation uses the date on the letter or report, not the receipt date?

• A. The Joint Commission
• B. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)
• C. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
• D. URAC

Answer: (B)

Written verification should reflect the authoritative decision date, not how long it took to receive the document. NCQA uses the date shown on the accreditation letter or report—the official date of the accreditation decision—as the valid date for verification. This anchors the credentialing record to a precise, auditable timestamp for when accreditation was granted and when it expires. If you relied on the receipt date, mail delays or processing time could shift the perceived timing of accreditation, creating inconsistencies. Other accreditors may not consistently base verification on the document’s date, which can lead to variability, making NCQA the best fit for this approach.

Written verification should reflect the authoritative decision date, not how long it took to receive the document. NCQA uses the date shown on the accreditation letter or report—the official date of the accreditation decision—as the valid date for verification. This anchors the credentialing record to a precise, auditable timestamp for when accreditation was granted and when it expires. If you relied on the receipt date, mail delays or processing time could shift the perceived timing of accreditation, creating inconsistencies. Other accreditors may not consistently base verification on the document’s date, which can lead to variability, making NCQA the best fit for this approach.